E.U. proposed to review the current version of the ambient air quality directive

The European Commission proposed a reviewed version of the ambient air quality directive that was in force since 2008. The main scope of the revision is to develop a new set of stricter threshold limits which will be used from 2030 and align the vision with the WHO global air quality guidelines updated in 2021. Moreover, the new threshold limits aim to accelerate and reinforce both zero air pollution and zero carbon emissions targets.

The proposed revision mainly targets reductions of particulate matter and nitrogen dioxide levels identically to the new WHO limits. For instance, the new proposal includes a sharp reduction of annual mean PM2.5 and PM10 concentrations. The proposed PM2.5 concentration limit will drop by more than 100% from 25 µg/m3 to 10 µg/m3. Identically, the PM10 threshold limit will be tightened by 100% from 40 µg/m3 to 20 µg/m3. Finally, nitrogen dioxide’s annual concentration limit will be identically reduced from 40 µg/m3 to 20 µg/m3. The overall comparison of the proposed values and the current threshold limits is given in the table below.

Table 1

Table 1. Current air quality threshold limits and the proposed values

In addition to the stricter threshold limits, the new proposal includes reductions in the number of days/hours when the concentration of a certain pollutant can exceed certain levels. For instance, the current directive set a 24-hours mean for PM10 of 50 µg/m3 and not to be exceeded more than 35 days/year. On the other hand, in the new proposal, the new 24-hour mean for PM10 is reduced to 40 µg/m3 and on top of it, it should not exceed the limit of more than 18 days per year.

As was said at the beginning of the article, the new proposal was developed to align with the new WHO air quality threshold limit update. However, it is important to mention that most of the values proposed by the WHO organisation are very ambitious and in some cases are not realistic. On the other hand, the new proposal from the European Commission seems to be more realistic and achievable in the coming future. The comparison of the limits from the European Commission and the WHO is given in the table below.

table 2

Table 2. Comparison of the limits from the European Commission and the WHO

In conclusion, Airscan believes that the new guidelines will be warmly welcomed by governmental agencies and NGOs of European Union. Only collective actions can make the air clean in Europe and also around the world. Finally, an extension of the air quality monitoring network in all countries and regions of EU is the first step to be taken by governments in this important topic.

Learned something? Feel free to share.

Airscan partnerships
stephanie leblanc suTr28QV4wU unsplash

Ozone Levels In Brussels For The Last 10 Years

Did you know that the very air we breathe can be both a shield and a hazard? While ozone high up in the atmosphere protects us from the sun’s harmful rays, ground-level ozone can pose serious health risks. Airscan’s latest decade-long study reveals alarming trends in ozone levels across Brussels, with certain summer days seeing concentrations double the WHO’s recommended limit. Dive into our findings to understand how ozone impacts your environment and discover practical tips to protect yourself during high-pollution days..

Purecities Kunak AirPro

Pure Cities: how temperature, wind and rain shape our air

This article explores the seasonal variations in air pollution and the influence of meteorological factors on pollutant concentrations, focusing on data from the “Pure Cities” project in Belgium. Analyzing pollutants like PM2.5, PM10, and NO2, the study highlights how temperature, humidity, wind speed, atmospheric pressure, and precipitation affect air quality throughout the year. Findings show that pollutant levels tend to rise during colder months due to increased residential heating and reduced dispersion. The article discusses the importance of addressing seasonal pollution through targeted strategies, such as enhancing public transport, promoting green spaces, and aligning regulations with WHO guidelines.

Figure 1 2 1

Beats for Planet: Key Findings of 3 Years of Air Quality Monitoring in Belgian Schools

3 Years of Beats for Planet: this is what we know about air quality in Belgian schools! If you have been following Airscan for a while, you will definitely know Beats for Planet. Airscan launched this project with Belfius three years ago with the aim of helping schools improve their air quality. In the framework of this project, Airscan has collected and analyzed data from 72 schools around Belgium for three indoor pollutants: carbon dioxide (CO2), particulate matter (PM) and volatile organic compounds (VOC). This is what we found..